1 Corinthians 12:7-10 — Discerning the Spirits (Because of the Gospel)
June 4th, 2023 › SermonsNew to Hope? We’re glad you’re here! Text the word WELCOME to 512-777-1826 to connect with our welcome team!
The big idea
The ability to distinguish between spirits is not spooky, and it is not a personality
inventory. It is the gift of answering one question about a message, a minister or a movement:
is this from God? Paul answers it three ways — by the gospel it is built on, by the
life of the person carrying it, and by the fruit it grows in the people who receive it.
Key takeaways
- Paul sets discerning of spirits right beside prophecy, and John does the same thing in
different words. The two belong together: welcome the Spirit’s speech, and test it. - Discernment is not cataloguing people into types, and it is not naming the angels in the
room. It asks one question, and the question is about the source. - A false word does three kinds of damage: it is untrue, it plants a wolf inside a flock,
and it divides a church, because anyone challenged can always answer that the truth has
always been unpopular. - Test one is the gospel. Galatians 1:8 sets the bar at an angel from heaven — it does not
matter who is speaking or how good they are at it. - Test two is conduct. Paul defends his ministry by pointing at how he behaved among the
Thessalonians, which only sounds strange until you notice he does it every time. - Test three is fruit. God’s word bears its own fruit; you do not have to manufacture it,
and opponents have never managed to stop it. - The answer to fear of the wrong spirit is not avoiding spiritual things altogether. That
is a victory for somebody, just not for you.
Hope Chapel has been working through 1 Corinthians, and Matt’s last turn in the
pulpit landed on prophecy in chapter 12. This week he took the phrase sitting one line below it
on Paul’s list — the ability to distinguish between spirits — and made the case that it is not a
curiosity of the charismatic fringe but something a church cannot function without.
1. The gift below prophecy on the list
Matt does not read
1 Corinthians 12:7–10
as an exhaustive inventory: “I think the Holy Spirit can enable God’s people with whatever he
wants, whenever he wants.” What governs the whole chapter is the opening line — each gift is
given for the common good. And he takes the ordering seriously. Just as tongues and their
interpretation are paired, distinguishing between spirits sits directly after prophecy, and that
is no accident.
What it is not: “I don’t think it’s like a librarian cataloging people into types,” he said —
you are an extrovert teacher, you are an administration type, like the Oracle in The
Matrix. Nor is it working out which angels are in the room and what their names are. John
gives the cleanest definition of it anywhere.
“Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God,
for many false prophets have gone out into the world… every spirit that confesses that Jesus
Christ has come in the flesh is from God.”
2. Why a false word does real damage
Paul pairs the same two instincts:
“Do
not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is
good.” Note the plural in John — spirits. Scott had already read it aloud earlier in
the service:
there
is a spirit at work in the sons of disobedience. Spiritual activity is not all one thing.
Matt named three harms. The false thing is false, and falsehood has its own bad effects.
It installs someone inside a community who will keep saying such things — a wolf in sheep’s
clothing. And it is divisive, because the moment anyone tries to correct it the answer comes back
easily: the truth has always been unpopular, or, I knew you wouldn’t recognize the Spirit of God.
That is emotionally manipulative, and it works. Jesus warned about exactly this.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous
wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits… every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the
diseased tree bears bad fruit.”
He is not talking about the occasional apple that rots, Matt said — he is talking about what an
apple tree does. Beautiful, and still short on specifics. So where do you get the detail?
From watching Paul defend his own ministry and scrutinize other people’s.
3. First test: the one gospel
It does not matter that a movement is the new thing in town, that the teaching is fresh, or
that the parties are good. If it is not built on the one gospel, it is no good. Paul sets the bar
absurdly high on purpose:
“Even
if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to
you, let him be accursed.” Not even them, and not even an angel. “There’s only one
gospel,” Matt said. “The rest — trash it. Walk away. Or run, don’t walk.”
4. Second test: how the messenger behaves
The template is the opening of 1 Thessalonians, where all three tests appear in a single
breath:
“Our gospel came to you not only in word, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with
full conviction. You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. And you
became imitators of us and of the Lord, for you received the word in much affliction, with the
joy of the Holy Spirit.”
The contrast follows in the next chapter, and it reads like a list of what to look for:
no
error, no impurity, no attempt to deceive, no words of flattery, no pretext for greed, no glory
sought from people. Matt paused on the flattery line and wondered aloud whether there was an
inside joke in it — Paul must have said something unflattering. Then the conduct itself:
working
night and day so as not to be a burden, holy and righteous and blameless, gentle as a nursing
mother, exhorting each one like a father with his children.
“The behavior of the minister actually does matter a great deal,” Matt said. It sounds like a
strange thing to put in a defense of a ministry, until you notice Paul does it every time.
5. Third test: what it grows in the people
The third mark is not fruit in the messenger but fruit in those who receive the message:
“you
accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in
you believers.” When it is genuinely his, it bears its own fruit, because it is living and
active. Which is also why rejection is never merely personal —
whoever
disregards this disregards not man but God. Paul is not the brains behind it. He is, in Matt’s
phrase, Jesus’ lackey.
And there is a second party with an interest in the outcome.
Paul
wanted to come again and again, “but Satan hindered us.” He sent Timothy
“for
fear that somehow the tempter had tempted you and our labor would be in vain.” The point of a
temptation, Matt noted, is that it looks good: “It’d be a dumb temptation if all of it looked real
bad. It’s not appealing, it smells bad — a big bucket of sludge, no thanks.” Plenty of things that
are not good sound good, which is the whole reason the gift exists.
You also cannot manufacture that fruit, or suppress it. People have tried to squash the church
and it grew anyway, which is more or less
Gamaliel’s
argument in Acts — Matt reached for it, admitted on the spot that he had mangled the
reference, and moved on. He kept one more passage he had nearly cut:
the
day of the Lord comes like a thief, but not to those who are not in darkness. The early church
left us a legacy of longing for that day, and the way a bride prepares for the bridegroom is by
walking in the light.
6. There is a spirit behind every message
Back in 1 Corinthians 12, Paul has already said this in the chapter’s opening lines.
“You know that when you were pagans you were led astray to mute idols, however you were led.
Therefore I want you to understand that no one speaking in the Spirit of God ever says ‘Jesus is
accursed,’ and no one can say ‘Jesus is Lord’ except in the Holy Spirit.”
They did not wander into idolatry by accident — they were led. And Paul is explicit
about what does the leading:
pagan
sacrifice is offered to demons and not to God; you cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of
demons. So the world is not neutral about Jesus. Matt asked the room to notice how the mockery
aimed at Christ runs hotter than the mockery aimed at other faiths, and to wonder what animates
it. Each message has a spirit behind it that promotes it and looks for people to partner with it.
John says the same thing in his own vocabulary —
“By
this we know the Spirit of truth and the spirit of error.”
7. Do not quench, and do not swallow
There is an obvious escape route here, and Matt closed it: “I don’t want to be caught up in
something demonic, so let’s just do nothing spiritual at all. Is that really our path to victory?
It’s a path to someone’s victory.” Do not quench the Spirit. Do not squash prophecy. And
do not accept a word because you like the man — test everything, even from someone older than you,
someone who knows the Bible better than you, someone who can read Greek.
He also refused to make it frightening. He mentioned an email that had slipped past his spam
filter with the subject line The Antichrist is coming, and let it stand as a small case
study: the spirit of antichrist is not a forecast, it is already in the world, and engaging that
particular correspondent was not the remedy.
“He
who is in you is greater than he who is in the world.” The conflict does not need to spook
you. It also does not mean you drop your filter.
8. Three ways it actually goes wrong
Matt ran the rubric backwards through three portraits. First, the prophetic word sought outside
the gospel — no one at church was available, so go get a hand reading, the horoscopes are
surprisingly useful for your prophetic career. No. Second, the minister with genuinely sharp
insight whose encouragements are built on almost the gospel, with a strange legalism
running underneath and a pressure to buy into the Spirit in ways that do not sound free because of
the cross: “I don’t care how fancy or specific this guy’s ministry is.” Third, the polished
operation where you cannot see the gospel problem and cannot see behind closed doors — but look at
the community it grows. “Perhaps the disciples of this movement are the extremists who feel like
they’re a cut above you. They have extra Spirit, you have less. They’re the Marines, you were
sitting at home. You have a junior Holy Spirit.”
The gospel is scandalous in the opposite direction, he said — so much grace, so much
acceptance, the Holy Spirit given entirely because of Christ, which is precisely why no one should
ever be able to sell you forgiveness or sell you the Spirit. Discernment is not a side issue and
it is not a hobby for the spiritually advanced. It is central, and it should be asked for: “Lord,
that you would give us discernment… that your voice and the message about you would be our
focus.”